Quality & performance metrics
Measure sets, definitions, and attribution that break across EHR, payer, and reporting layers.
Healthcare & Public Health
Defensible data for environments where the consequences are real. Decisions tied to quality, outcomes, compliance, and public trust.
InformatiQx supports healthcare and public-health leaders where untrusted data isn’t just frustrating — it’s decision risk.
Our posture: decision-first. Asynchronous by default.
We don’t do open-ended “exploration” in high-stakes environments.
You get a defensible recommendation: what holds, what doesn’t, and what must happen before you commit.
Proceed
Proceed with constraints
Stop / Reset
Context
Healthcare data doesn’t fail quietly.
When definitions drift or systems disagree, the fallout shows up in audits, missed targets, compliance issues, and leadership distrust — not just messy dashboards.
- Clinical, operational, and financial metrics conflict across systems and teams.
- Regulatory pressure reduces tolerance for ambiguity and undocumented logic.
- Legacy workflows and workarounds quietly undermine metric truth.
- Leadership decisions carry patient, community, and reputational consequences.
Where this shows up
Decisions healthcare leaders get punished for.
These aren’t analytics projects. These are choices tied to accountability — where “probably right” isn’t good enough.
Revenue integrity & audit risk
Denials, coding variance, charge capture, and “numbers leadership is claiming” vs what systems support.
Access & throughput
ED flow, LOS, wait times, capacity signals, and operational truth that fractures by site and workflow.
Public health reporting & registries
Timeliness, completeness, case definitions, linkage, and the hidden logic behind counts.
AI readiness & automation risk
When “add AI” shows up before data trust, governance, and definition control exist.
Executive narrative conflicts
Board/leadership decks where stakeholders disagree and someone needs to decide what’s defendable.
Approach
How InformatiQx supports healthcare & public health leaders.
We start with a defensible recommendation, then extend into roadmap and governance only where it changes outcomes.
Data Clarity Advisory (Asynchronous)
A focused expert review that identifies where truth breaks, what decision risk you’re carrying, and the most defensible next step. You receive a written recommendation leaders can act on.
Start via Get Data Clarity.
Data Clarity Sprint™
A time-boxed engagement to resolve metric conflict, lock definitions, and produce a decision-ready verdict brief with documentation leaders can defend.
Often the next step after Advisory. See Sprint details.
Pathfinder™ Roadmap
Translate Sprint findings into a prioritized plan: KPI ownership, workflow fixes, system changes, and governance to prevent definition drift.
Navigator™ Advisory
Ongoing decision intelligence support for leaders who need continuity, institutional memory, and defensible metric governance — without adding headcount.
Deliverables
What you get (healthcare-grade artifacts).
Leaders don’t need more analysis. They need documentation that survives scrutiny.
Verdict Brief
- Proceed / constrain / stop recommendation
- What’s defensible today and why
- Decision risk statement leaders can repeat
Metric Definition Lock
- Single definition + calculation for the decision
- Source-of-truth callout (and what it is not)
- Known limitations and safe constraints
Trust & Provenance Map
- Where truth breaks: workflow, logic, system handoffs
- Hidden workarounds and failure points
- What must be governed to prevent drift
Execution Priorities
- What to fix first (and what to ignore)
- Ownership and decision rights
- What to monitor to prevent relapse
Fit
Who this work is designed for.
Built for leaders accountable for outcomes — not just reporting.
A strong fit if you’re leading:
- Healthcare operations, analytics, or quality programs
- Public health surveillance, reporting, or registries
- Regulatory, compliance, or performance initiatives
- Cross-functional teams struggling to align on metric truth